Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832133›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

AlloDerm Vs DermACELL in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of All Head-to-Head Comparisons.

Yousef Tanas, Gioacchino De Sario Velasquez, Julie Tanas, Grace Gasper, Shadi Tanas, Keyvon Rashidi, Sarya Swed, Murad Karadsheh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gioacchino De Sario Velasquez
Julie Tanas
Grace Gasper
Shadi Tanas
Keyvon Rashidi
Murad Karadsheh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: AlloDerm (LifeCell, Branchburg, NJ) and DermACELL (LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, VA) are 2 commonly used acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Objectives: In this head-to-head meta-analysis, the authors aim to compare the clinical outcomes, including complication rates and BREAST-Q patient satisfaction, associated with AlloDerm and DermACELL. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies in April 2024 and again in April 2025. The authors included all studies with data comparing AlloDerm and DermACELL. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Results: The search yielded 1006 studies, of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1872 patients (2940 breasts) were analyzed, with 1724 breasts receiving AlloDerm and 1433 breasts receiving DermACELL. The analysis revealed that AlloDerm was associated with a slightly higher incidence of seroma formation (risk ratio = 1.49, 95% CI, 1.14-1.95, Conclusions: DermACELL demonstrated a slightly lower incidence of seroma formation compared with AlloDerm. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these results and explore the long-term outcomes associated with both ADMs. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:

Identifiers

PMID40832133
PMCPMC12358236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.