Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832034›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The code of sustainable success in fitness apps: social comparison mechanism enabled by user facilitated supports.

Kuang Wu, Qi Li, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kuang WuSchool of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qi LiSchool of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yang LiuSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Integrating social comparison theory and social support theory, this study develops a holistic model examining how fitness app social features influence sustainable development of users. This study not only extends the influence of user facilitated support, but also explores the social comparison factors, providing unique insights into interpreting the mechanism of continuous use intention and fitness intention. Methods: This study collects empirical data by distributing questionnaires. We use structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between fitness app social features, continuous use intention and fitness intention. Results: This study finds that information support, emotional support and upward comparison affect social presence and fitness interest positively, which in turn affect continuous use intention and fitness intention positively. Interestingly, downward comparison affects social presence negatively. Discussion: These findings provide references for fitness platform practitioners to design marketing strategies and thus improve the sustainable commercial value of fitness apps. In addition, the results can be applied to promote users' fitness motivation and thus offer sustainable health value to the society.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPhysical FitnessSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and Questionnairesfitness apppublic healthsocial comparison theorysocial support theorysustainable success

Identifiers

PMID40832034
PMCPMC12358456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.