ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Liquid biopsy in TNBC: significance in diagnostics, prediction, and treatment monitoring.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Plasticity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Axitinib promotes stemness and vasculogenic mimicry in triple-negative breast cancer by disrupting THBS1-CD47 axis-mediated endothelial-tumor cell communication.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Biomolecular Alterations for the Diagnosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Adults: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Drug Delivery Systems for Breast Cancer: From Microenvironment Barriers and Smart Carriers to Clinical Translation Strategies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Phytochemical-Primed Extracellular Vesicles and Plant-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles as Endogenous Nanomedicine Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Triple-negative breast cancer: current understanding and future perspectives.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the leading cause of mortality among women worldwide. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is recognized as t the most aggressive form of breast cancer, with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate within two years. The role of tumor markers in facilitating the early diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in TNBC is well-established. Currently, tissue biopsy remains the standard clinical method for determining tumor histology and staging. However, the invasive nature of tissue biopsy often leads to poor patient compliance, especially when repeated biopsies are required. In contrast, liquid biopsy offers several advantages: it is non-invasive, sample collection is straightforward, it can reflect the overall tumor burden and heterogeneity, and it allows for real-time monitoring. The markers primarily encompass circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), long ncRNA (lncRNAs), exosome, and so forth. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements and potential clinical applications of liquid biopsy technology in the context of TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.