ArticleLiver cancer2025
First-Line Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Post hoc Analysis of Japanese Patients from the Phase 3 LEAP-002 Trial.
Article in Liver cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713593 (A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-controlled, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Active-controlled, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Lenvatinib in First-line Therapy of Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (LEAP-002)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ginsenoside Rg1 triggers ferroptosis to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma via SLC7A11 downregulation.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Lenvatinib or Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CheckMate 9DW Japanese Subgroup Analysis.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Identification of the CYP19A1-GPER1 axis as a critical oncogenic driver in hepatocellular carcinoma via AKT activation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Liver Transplantation Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: What Do We Need to Know from Clinical and Immunological Perspective?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Vaccines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The phase 3 LEAP-002 study (NCT03713593) of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggested improved antitumor activity of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib alone with manageable safety, although overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not reach prespecified statistical significance. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety in Japanese patients. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC without prior systemic treatment were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 8 mg (body weight <60 kg) or 12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) oral lenvatinib once daily plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Dual primary end points were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and time to progression per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Results: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled in Japan (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, Conclusion: In Japanese patients enrolled in LEAP-002, findings were consistent with the global population where OS and PFS trended toward improvement; a similar safety profile was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.