Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831876›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case Report of Extrapelvic Endometriosis: Surgeon's Perspective and Review of the Literature.

Prabu Shankar Sivagnanam, Husham Bakry, Aysha Aljawder

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prabu Shankar SivagnanamGeneral Surgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Al Sayh, BHR.
Husham BakryGeneral Surgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Al Sayh, BHR.
Aysha AljawderPathology, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Al Sayh, BHR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis, while commonly managed by gynecologists, is rarely encountered by general surgeons and is often identified incidentally or upon histopathological examination. This condition can manifest in both pelvic and extrapelvic sites, with extrapelvic endometriosis most frequently observed in the gastrointestinal tract and abdominal wall. Cesarean scar endometriosis (CSE) is the most prevalent form of abdominal wall endometriosis. Cyclical symptoms linked to menstruation occur in around half of patients and should raise suspicion in cases presenting with scar-related or subcutaneous swellings. This report presents two cases of extrapelvic endometriosis: one involving appendiceal endometriosis, which was unexpectedly identified as appendicitis, and another with CSE, diagnosed after surgical excision of a painful swelling in the cesarean section scar. The discussion focuses on the diagnosis and management of CSE and appendiceal endometriosis.

Indexed as

abdominal wallappendicealcesarean section scarendometriosisextrapelvic

Identifiers

PMID40831876
PMCPMC12360736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.