Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831875›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Intestinal Sarcoidosis: A Diagnostic Conundrum.

Alveena Imran, Rida Suleman, Rahul Bhat, Humayun Nasir

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alveena ImranRespiratory Medicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Rida SulemanMedicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Rahul BhatRespiratory Medicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Humayun NasirMedicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disorder of unknown cause, most commonly affecting the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman in whom intestinal sarcoidosis was incidentally discovered alongside pulmonary involvement. The diagnosis was made during evaluation of trauma-related findings and confirmed through PET-CT, colonoscopy, and biopsy. GI sarcoidosis can closely mimic other granulomatous diseases, such as Crohn's disease or certain infections, making diagnosis particularly challenging. In this case, the presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with granulomas and PET-positive uptake in the ascending colon and a lymph node supported the diagnosis. Infectious and inflammatory bowel disease causes were excluded. The patient remained asymptomatic, so treatment was not initiated, consistent with current guidelines that recommend corticosteroids or surgical intervention only for symptomatic or severe disease. Intestinal sarcoidosis, particularly colonic involvement, remains exceedingly rare. However, clinicians should consider it in the differential diagnosis of colonic lesions, especially when imaging reveals evidence of extraintestinal sarcoidosis. Diagnosis relies on histopathological confirmation and the exclusion of other potential causes. Many patients remain asymptomatic and do not require treatment, although corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or surgery may be necessary in symptomatic or complicated cases. Further research is warranted to explore potential associations, such as with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and to determine optimal management strategies.

Indexed as

colon sarcoidosisextrapulmonary sarcoidosisgi sarcoidosisintestinal sarcoidosislarge intestine sarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID40831875
PMCPMC12359978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.