ArticleCureus2025
A Rare Case of Chronic Coronary Artery Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare and underrecognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly in young and middle-aged women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. While most cases heal spontaneously, a subset may persist, evolving into what can be considered a chronic coronary artery dissection (CCAD). This chronic form remains poorly defined and rarely documented. A 44-year-old woman with a history of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presented several months later with recurrent chest pain. Coronary angiography revealed a persistent dissection in the mid-left anterior descending (LAD) artery without signs of active ischemia or evolving intramural hematoma. No advanced imaging was performed, but the stability of angiographic findings over time and the absence of ischemic symptoms supported the diagnosis of a chronic dissection. The initial STEMI was retrospectively considered to have resulted from an unrecognized SCAD. Given the lack of ischemia and the risks associated with intervention in SCAD, conservative management was continued. The patient remained asymptomatic and free of major cardiac events over a 12-month follow-up period. Chronic dissection may be overlooked in patients with a history of SCAD. Although angiography remains the main diagnostic tool, it has limitations, and adjunctive imaging such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may help confirm chronicity. Current understanding of the long-term course of SCAD, including recurrence risk and follow-up strategies, is still limited. CCAD should be considered in patients with recurrent chest pain and prior SCAD history. Further studies are needed to better define its prognosis, recurrence risk, and optimal monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.