ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
SbD4Skin by EosCloud: Integrating multi-view molecular representation for predicting skin sensitization, irritation, and acute dermal toxicity.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Multiview Information for Enhanced Deep Learning-Based Acute Dermal Toxicity Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Optimizing skin sensitization prediction across activity cliffs: a comparative analysis of K-nearest neighbours vs random Forest.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- ARACRA: Automated RNA-seq Analysis for Chemical Risk Assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing chemical toxicity is essential for understanding potential risks to human health. However, ethical, financial, and scientific challenges have driven the demand for non-animal testing methods. This study introduces a computational framework that leverages diverse molecular representations, including MACCS keys, Morgan fingerprints, and Mordred descriptors, to predict skin sensitization, irritation/corrosion, and acute dermal toxicity. Different molecular representations for skin toxicity-related endpoints were first evaluated using three machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and k-Nearest Neighbors), then combined into a unified input space for training a fully connected neural network (FCNN). Comparative analyses indicate that this multi-view FCNN model offers superior or comparable predictive performance relative to single-representation models, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of up to 0.91 for irritation/corrosion, 0.88 for sensitization, and 0.82 for acute dermal toxicity on test sets. Additional validation on known toxicants further confirms the framework's robustness, correctly identifying 0.86 of skin sensitizers, 0.89 of irritants, and 0.86 of dermally toxic compounds. Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analyses highlight the most influential molecular features, providing mechanistic insights and enhancing model transparency. To promote broader adoption and reduce reliance on animal testing, the developed models are freely available through the SbD4Skin (Safe by Design for Skin) web platform (https://eoscloud.entelos.eu/ssbd4chem/sbd4skin/), offering a user-friendly tool for chemical risk assessment and regulatory decision-making. The dataset and model developed in this study have been FAIRified and made available in machine-actionable and modelling-ready formats, supporting transparency, reuse, and regulatory acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.