Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831770›Full record

ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2025

Achieving Psychological Safety in High Reliability Organizations.

Col Ret John S Murray, Jeannine Campbell, Stacey Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Col Ret John S MurrayIndependent Consultant, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeannine CampbellVeterans Affairs Providence Healthcare System, Rhode Island.
Stacey LarsonVeterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Veterans Health Administration is the largest integrated health care system in the United States, and becoming an enterprise-wide high reliability organization (HRO). In extremely complex and risk-prone environments, HROs provide safe, high-quality patient care without causing harm or adverse events. Integral to this work is psychological safety-the belief that team members can comfortably speak up when they have questions, voice concerns (especially regarding safety), take risks, and suggest ways of doing things differently. These actions are taken without undue fear of negative consequences, such as humiliation or criticism. Although progress has been made, much still needs to be done to promote psychological safety in all health care systems-especially HROs. Observations: In its journey to become an enterprise-wide HRO, the Veterans Health Administration has implemented initiatives to develop and foster psychological safety as a means to promote patient safety and improve outcomes. In this article, we describe strategies that can be implemented to promote psychological safety. Conclusions: Psychological safety is critical to providing safe, quality health care within an HRO. However, achieving and cultivating psychological safety in this setting requires time and patience and must be actively promoted and supported. It also requires thoughtful and purposeful attention to strategies that promote a culture where individuals feel safe to speak up when they have safety concerns.

Identifiers

PMID40831770
PMCPMC12360811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.