Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831754›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Lessons learnt in the response to COVID-19 in Mozambique: enabling readiness for the next pandemic.

Mariana E Posse, Grace Njeri Muriithi, Daniel Malik Achala, Elizabeth Naa Adukwei Adote, Chinyere Ojiugo Mbachu, Senait Alemayehu Beshah, Chijioke Osinachi Nwosu, John Ele-Ojo Ataguba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariana E PosseDepartment of Research, Mariana Posse Consultoria, EI, Maputo, Mozambique.
Grace Njeri MuriithiAfrican Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA), Accra, Ghana.
Daniel Malik AchalaAfrican Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA), Accra, Ghana.
Elizabeth Naa Adukwei AdoteAfrican Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA), Accra, Ghana.
Chinyere Ojiugo MbachuDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Senait Alemayehu BeshahAfrican Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA), Accra, Ghana.
Chijioke Osinachi NwosuDepartment of Economics and Finance, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
John Ele-Ojo AtagubaAfrican Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA), Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a dramatic loss of human lives worldwide and caused economic and social disruptions. The risk of another pandemic occurring is ever-present requiring countries to document factors that influenced the response to COVID-19 to guide the response to future pandemics. This study documents lessons learnt from Mozambique's COVID-19 response, considering the perspectives of various stakeholders and examining different components of the response. Methods: We used a qualitative phenomenology research design and collected data using in-depth interviews. We used purposive sampling by selecting institutions with relevant experience and knowledge to inform the study objectives. We also used snowballing techniques by asking respondents for other potential informants. We interviewed 19 individuals indicated by the representatives of the institutions selected for the study. The institutions were mostly based in Maputo city, the country's capital. Participants were asked about their role in the organization; responsibility in vaccine distribution and delivery in Mozambique; their opinion on what worked well in the country's response to COVID-19, and what could be improved as preparation to future pandemics. Data was coded using a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software Maxqda 2020 and analyzed using a deductive thematic approach. A validation meeting was held, in which research participants were asked to check the accuracy of the results and interpretations. Results: Key drivers of the COVID-19 response were strong leadership; a clear plan and strategies; a functional coordination mechanism; the use of evidence to make decisions; a careful consideration of priority groups; investments in the supply chain and surveillance systems; the utilization of pre-existing vaccination structures; and partnership between the government and several stakeholders. There is room for improvement including the development of a clear budget, a communication plan, creation of an emergency fund, accountability in the use of funds, decentralization of surveillance infrastructure and representation of vulnerable, marginalized, and hard-to-reach populations in the design and implementation of pandemic response. Conclusion: The lessons learned from the COVID-19 response in Mozambique, which could be considered when preparing for an effective and equitable response to future pandemics, are in essence the following: there should be government leadership, a response plan, adequate resources, use of data to inform decisions, constant vigilance, a prompt response, involvement of all stakeholders and documentation of actions for continuous learning. These lessons could improve pandemic preparedness nationally and globally.

Indexed as

COVID-19disaster readinessequitylessons learnedMozambiquepandemicresponsevulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID40831754
PMCPMC12360260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.