ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Integrative green synthesis and molecular simulation of ibrutinib cocrystals for enhanced biopharmaceutical performance and in vivo pharmacokinetics.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality by design-based development of ibrutinib polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles for enhanced lymphatic absorption and anticancer efficacy.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Biopharmaceutical Profiling of Herpetrione: A BCS II Properties and P-gp Substrate Guiding Nanoparticle Design.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- A Review on Nanocarrier-Based Strategies for Sunitinib Delivery: Advances in Pharmacokinetic Enhancement and Targeted Theranostics.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- An overview of advanced nanocarrier systems for Ibrutinib delivery: overcoming pharmacokinetic barriers and enabling targeted cancer therapy.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, Ibrutinib (IBR), belongs to class II of the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). CYP3A4 enzyme forces IBR to have a very limited oral bioavailability. This study employed hot-melt extrusion (HME) with carboxylic and carboxamide coformers, guided by computational screening, to prepare and characterize IBR cocrystals (IBR-CC). Several carboxylic acid and carboxyl amide coformers were chosen in accordance with computational evaluations and predictions for the solubility parameter to formulate IBR-CC. According to the computational results, the formulated IBR-CC systems had multiple hydrogen bonds and π-π-stacking interactions. The IBR-CC formulations were further evaluated for powder dissolution studies, flow properties, and in vitro release studies. Furthermore, IBR-CC formulations were correlated with better anticancer action in K562-CCL-243 cancer cells when compared with IBR. From the in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation studies, it was proven that the IBR oral bioavailability in IBR-Nicotinamide-cocrystal formulation has shown a 4.58-fold improvement, IBR-Fumaric acid-cocrystal formulation has shown a 2.66-fold improvement, and IBR-3-Hydroxy benzoic acid has shown a 1.76-fold enhancement when compared with pure IBR suspension. Biodistribution studies showed greater drug release in the intestine and other lymphoid organs when administered with IBR-Nicotinamide-cocrystal formulation than pure IBR suspension. As a result, the IBR-CC formulations produced utilizing the HME approach serve as an effective method of drug delivery that increases IBR's solubility and oral bioavailability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.