ArticleHealth science reports2025
Advancing Medical Education: Assessing Technology-Enhanced Learning Through the Lens of the Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists (CanMEDS) Framework-A Perspective Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role reconstruction among double-qualified nursing educators in the generative AI era: a qualitative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The CanMEDS framework is a widely adopted competency-based model that defines essential roles for physicians to ensure high-quality patient care. Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) has emerged as a transformative approach in medical education, offering flexible, interactive, and personalized learning experiences. This study explores the integration of TEL within the CanMEDS framework assessment model to enhance competency evaluation in medical education. Methods: This perspective study reviews the evolving role of TEL in medical education and its alignment with the seven CanMEDS roles: Medical Expert, Communicator, Collaborator, Leader, Health Advocate, Scholar, and Professional. It examines the benefits and challenges of TEL integration, including innovative assessment methods such as virtual simulations, artificial intelligence, and mobile applications. Results: TEL provides significant advantages in accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of competency assessments. Virtual reality and AI-driven tools enable realistic clinical scenarios and personalized feedback, improving the evaluation of complex skills. TEL also supports continuous learning and collaboration through digital platforms. However, challenges include ensuring assessment validity and reliability, addressing institutional barriers, faculty training needs, ethical concerns regarding data privacy, and disparities in technology access. Conclusion: Integrating TEL into the CanMEDS framework enhances medical education by offering innovative, flexible, and effective assessment methods. To maximize benefits, institutions must address technological, ethical, and pedagogical challenges through comprehensive implementation plans, faculty development, and clear guidelines. Emerging technologies hold promise for further advancing competency-based education, ensuring future physicians are well-equipped to meet evolving healthcare demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.