ArticleJournal of surgery and research2025
Predicting bleeding risk in PAD patients on antiplatelets using TEG coagulation testing.
Article in Journal of surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Bleeding is a major concern while using antithrombotic therapy. While Thromboelastography with Platelet Mapping (TEG-PM) predicts postoperative bleeding and platelet dysfunction in trauma, its utility in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate whether platelet inhibition (PI) and maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate (MA ADP) can predict bleeding risk in PAD. Methods: Patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization between 2021-2025 were prospectively evaluated and monitored for one year to identify bleeding events. Bleeding events were defined as clinically significant hemorrhages that required medical intervention or transfusion. Patients were stratified based on the occurrence of bleeding, and descriptive statistics characterized each group. The Mann-Whitney U test assessed differences in platelet function, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the optimal TEG-PM cutoff values for predicting increased bleeding risk. Results: A total of 234 patients were analyzed, of whom 14 (5%) experienced a bleeding event. The bleeding cohort exhibited higher platelet inhibition (94.5% vs. 24.1%; p<0.0001) and lower MA ADP (22.4 vs. 52; p<0.0001), suggesting reduced platelet aggregation and clot strength. ROC analysis revealed platelet inhibition >86.4% (AUC: 0.89, sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 92%) and MA ADP <31.9 (AUC: 0.85, sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 85%) as predictive thresholds for bleeding risk. Conclusion: High platelet inhibition (>86.4%) and low MA ADP (<31.9%) may serve as indicators of bleeding risk in PAD patients on antiplatelets, highlighting the potential utility of TEG-PM in guiding personalized antithrombotic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.