Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831657›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Individual Antipredator Responses Are Positively Correlated Across Cue Types in Free-Living Black-Capped Chickadees (

Emma L C Reid, Megan LaRocque, Josue David Arteaga-Torres, Kimberley J Mathot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma L C ReidDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9165-4356
Megan LaRocqueDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-1922
Josue David Arteaga-TorresDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5025-6109
Kimberley J MathotDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-1369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prey animals must accurately assess predation risk within their environment. To gather information about this risk, prey animals may personally sample the environment ("personal information") or observe the behavior of congeners ("social information"). Personal information is thought to be more accurate and reliable but may also require more time and energy to acquire. On the other hand, social information, such as alarm calls, tends to be less costly to obtain but may also be less reliable if congeners assess risk differently from one another, or if the information quickly becomes outdated. Theoretical models predict that individuals will differ in how they value personal versus social information. We used previously collected data from a marked population of black-capped chickadees (

Indexed as

antipredatory responseblack‐capped chickadeescue integrationforaging behaviorinformation theory

Identifiers

PMID40831657
PMCPMC12358306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.