ArticleJAMIA open2025
Assessing the advantages and disadvantages of dimensionality reduction methods in summarizing housing determinants of health in the United States.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate and compare different dimensionality reduction techniques for quantifying housing conditions as a social determinant of health (SDOH) across various geographic levels in the United States. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 housing characteristics from the American Community Survey data were analyzed at county, ZIP code, and Census tract levels. The robustness of 3 dimensionality reduction techniques was assessed in reducing the 15 housing characteristics into 1 housing score. These summarization methods included principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE), and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). We visualized geographic distributions of the housing scores, assessed methodological discrepancies between the techniques, and analyzed agreement between housing characteristic variability and housing score variability. Results: The selected dimensionality reduction methods generated housing scores that demonstrated acceptable face validity when visualized through choropleth maps. The PCA method provided the most stable and consistent results across geographic levels. The PCA method also resulted in the highest correlation between the variability of the underlying housing characteristics and the summarized housing score. Discussion: Data-driven summarization techniques provide an alternative approach to traditional expert-based indices in capturing housing conditions as a single SDOH factor. In this study, among the different summarized housing scores, the PCA-generated score offered superior robustness, persistent data structure, and higher stability across years. Conclusion: Principal component analysis was identified as the most reliable and interpretable approach for summarizing housing conditions across geographic levels. These findings contribute to the methodological foundation required to develop robust SDOH measures that can inform public health policies and address health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.