Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Naïma Ahmed Omar, Jéssica Roque, Céline Bergeaut, Laurent Bidault, Joëlle Amédée, Didier Letourneur, Jean-Christophe Fricain, Mathilde Fenelon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naïma Ahmed OmarUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France.
Jéssica RoqueUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France.
Céline BergeautSILTISS, Saint-Viance, France.
Laurent BidaultSILTISS, Saint-Viance, France.
Joëlle AmédéeUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France.
Didier LetourneurUniversité Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM 1148, LVTS, Hôpital X Bichat, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe FricainUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France.
Mathilde FenelonUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM 1026, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative biomaterials are increasingly being investigated for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, the development of relevant preclinical models still need to be consiedered. This study aimed to propose a standardized and reproducible maxillary bone defect model in rats that could be relevant to evaluate new materials for GBR. Three defect sizes in rat maxillary of 2.8, 3.3, and 4.5 mm in diameter were compared. Bone formation was followed until 12 weeks post-surgery using longitudinal micro-computed tomography and histological analysis. The defect was subsequently filled by an osteoconductive bone substitute (GLYCOBONE), then covered either by a new natural polysaccharide membrane supplemented with hydroxyapatite, or by a commercial collagen membrane (BIO-GIDE). Results showed little spontaneous tissue regeneration for empty defects (bone volume fractions (BVF) below 40% after 12 weeks). The smallest size defect (2.8 mm) was the most reproducible and was thus selected for testing GBR membranes. Defects filled with GLYCOBONE and covered with membranes displayed for both materials accelerated and substantial bone regeneration (with BVF that reached 80% after 12 weeks). Histological sections showed immature bone formation for the empty defects, whereas the defects filled with the GBR membranes highlighted a lamellar structured bone. The polysaccharide membrane was as effective as the commercial collagen membrane to guide bone tissue regeneration. This study provides a step-by-step protocol of a new standardized rat maxillary bone defect model. In line with ethical and financial considerations, this rodent model should be considered as a preliminary level before performing larger animal experiments.

Indexed as

bone graft substituteguided bone regenerationmembranemicro-computed tomographypreclinical model

Identifiers

PMID40831625
PMCPMC12359059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.