ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Small, open-source text-embedding models as substitutes to OpenAI models for gene analysis.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While foundation transformer-based models developed for gene expression data analysis can be costly to train and operate, a recent approach known as GenePT offers a low-cost and highly efficient alternative. GenePT utilizes OpenAI's text-embedding function to encode background information, which is in textual form, about genes. However, the closed-source, online nature of OpenAI's text-embedding service raises concerns regarding data privacy, among other issues. In this paper, we explore the possibility of replacing OpenAI's models with open-source transformer-based text-embedding models. We identified ten models from Hugging Face that are small in size, easy to install, and light in computation. Across all four gene classification tasks we considered, some of these models have outperformed OpenAI's, demonstrating their potential as viable, or even superior, alternatives. Additionally, we find that fine-tuning these models often does not lead to significant improvements in performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.