ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2025
Enhancing Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Images: The Impact of Targeted Data Augmentation Strategies.
Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated lesion segmentation in ultrasound (US) images based on deep learning (DL) approaches plays a crucial role in disease diagnosis and treatment. However, the successful implementation of these approaches is conditioned by large-scale and diverse annotated datasets whose obtention is tedious and expertise demanding. Although methods like generative adversarial networks (GANs) can help address sample scarcity, they are often associated with complex training processes and high computational demands, which can limit their practicality and feasibility, especially in resource-constrained scenarios. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring new solutions to address the challenge of limited annotated samples in automated lesion delineation in US images. Specifically, we propose five distinct mixed sample augmentation strategies and assess their effectiveness using four deep segmentation models for the delineation of two lesion types: breast and thyroid lesions. Extensive experimental analyses indicate that the effectiveness of these augmentation strategies is strongly influenced by both the lesion type and the model architecture. When appropriately selected, these strategies result in substantial performance improvements, with the Dice and Jaccard indices increasing by up to 37.95% and 36.32% for breast lesions and 14.59% and 13.01% for thyroid lesions, respectively. These improvements highlight the potential of the proposed strategies as a reliable solution to address data scarcity in automated lesion segmentation tasks. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the critical importance of carefully selecting data augmentation approaches, offering valuable insights into how their strategic application can significantly enhance the performance of DL models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.