Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2025

Enhancing Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Images: The Impact of Targeted Data Augmentation Strategies.

Xu Wang, Patrice Monkam, Bonan Zhao, Shouliang Qi, He Ma, Long Huang, Wei Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xu WangCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Patrice MonkamCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3805-9457
Bonan ZhaoCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Shouliang QiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-1939
He MaCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-3586
Long HuangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wei QianCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated lesion segmentation in ultrasound (US) images based on deep learning (DL) approaches plays a crucial role in disease diagnosis and treatment. However, the successful implementation of these approaches is conditioned by large-scale and diverse annotated datasets whose obtention is tedious and expertise demanding. Although methods like generative adversarial networks (GANs) can help address sample scarcity, they are often associated with complex training processes and high computational demands, which can limit their practicality and feasibility, especially in resource-constrained scenarios. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring new solutions to address the challenge of limited annotated samples in automated lesion delineation in US images. Specifically, we propose five distinct mixed sample augmentation strategies and assess their effectiveness using four deep segmentation models for the delineation of two lesion types: breast and thyroid lesions. Extensive experimental analyses indicate that the effectiveness of these augmentation strategies is strongly influenced by both the lesion type and the model architecture. When appropriately selected, these strategies result in substantial performance improvements, with the Dice and Jaccard indices increasing by up to 37.95% and 36.32% for breast lesions and 14.59% and 13.01% for thyroid lesions, respectively. These improvements highlight the potential of the proposed strategies as a reliable solution to address data scarcity in automated lesion segmentation tasks. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the critical importance of carefully selecting data augmentation approaches, offering valuable insights into how their strategic application can significantly enhance the performance of DL models.

Indexed as

data augmentation strategiesdeep learning modelslesion segmentationpseudolabeled sample generationultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID40831600
PMCPMC12360876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.