ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Basrah Score: a novel machine learning-based score for differentiating iron deficiency anemia and beta thalassemia trait using RBC indices.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the diagnostic performance of machine learning algorithms for differentiating iron deficiency anemia and thalassemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Genetic determinants of metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation and machine learning prediction of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted haematology: machine learning-based prediction of iron-deficiency anaemia from reticulocyte maturation indices.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and beta-thalassemia trait (BTT) are prevalent causes of microcytic anemia, often presenting overlapping hematological features that pose diagnostic challenges and necessitate prompt and precise management. Traditional discrimination indices-such as the Mentzer Index, Ihsan's formula, and the England and Fraser criteria-have been extensively applied in both research and clinical settings; however, their diagnostic performance varies considerably across different populations and datasets. This study proposes a novel and interpretable diagnostic model, the Basrah Score, developed using Elastic Net Logistic Regression (ENLR). This machine learning-based approach yields a flexible discrimination function that adapts to variations in clinical and environmental factors. The model was trained and validated on a local dataset of 2,120 individuals (1,080 with IDA and 1,040 with BTT), and was benchmarked against eight conventional indices. The Basrah Score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 96.7%, a sensitivity of 95.0%, and a specificity of 98.6%. These results underscore the importance of incorporating advanced pre-processing techniques, class balancing, hyperparameter optimization, and rigorous cross-validation to ensure the robustness of diagnostic models. Overall, this research highlights the potential of integrating interpretable machine learning models with established clinical parameters to improve diagnostic accuracy in hematological disorders, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.