Identity disclosure and experience of discrimination of LGBT+ members of the veterinary professions in the UK: A mixed-method approach using survey data.

Background: Workplace and educational discrimination remain institutional issues, particularly for minoritised individuals, and can negatively affect performance and opportunity. This study sought to investigate the experience of discrimination and identity disclosure (being 'out') of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and others (LGBT+) members of the UK veterinary professions and students. Methods: A mixed-method approach was utilised to analyse 130 survey responses and examine associations between respondents' identity disclosure (being 'out' or not) and other variables. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted, based within minority stress theory, to generate themes to explain findings. Results: Over half the respondents reported having experienced or witnessed a range of discriminatory behaviours, and over half were not 'out' to all. When considering people's decisions around identity disclosure negative associations were detected for those who had witnessed discrimination and those who were unsure about antidiscrimination policy, and positive associations for those who felt supported at their place of work or study and by veterinary community in general. Three themes were generated that begin to explain respondents' experiences. Limitations: Further research is required for institutions to know how our findings relate to their settings and to obtain additional in-depth understanding of individuals exposure to discrimination. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that LGBT+ discrimination remains an issue for some veterinary professionals and students in the UK. For the profession to move towards a more equitable future, we suggest that a multifaceted approach is needed to bolster institutional support and the active promotion of equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives.