Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831575›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in developmental psychology2024

Concurrent and longitudinal associations between touchscreen use and executive functions at preschool-age.

Alicia Mortimer, Abigail Fiske, Bethany Biggs, Rachael Bedford, Alexandra Hendry, Karla Holmboe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in developmental psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia MortimerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abigail FiskeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bethany BiggsSchool of Experimental Psychology, Univeristy of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rachael BedfordDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandra HendryDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Karla HolmboeSchool of Experimental Psychology, Univeristy of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300880Medical Research Council MR/N008626/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of touchscreen devices has recently risen amongst young children. Some evidence suggests that increased touchscreen use may be negatively related to preschool-age children's executive functions (EFs). However, it has been argued that actively interacting with touchscreen devices (e.g., via creative apps for drawing) could better support EF development compared to passive use (e.g., watching videos). There is a pressing need to understand whether the type of use can explain potential associations between touchscreen use and EF. Methods: By following up longitudinally on an infant sample, now aged 42-months ( Results: A multivariate multiple regression found no significant negative associations between touchscreen use and preschool EF. There was a significant positive association between active touchscreen use at 42-months and the BRIEF-P Flexibility Index. Discussion: The lack of significant negative associations found is consistent with an earlier study's findings in the same sample at infancy, suggesting that the moderate levels of early touchscreen use in this sample are not significantly associated with poorer EF, at least up to preschool-age.

Indexed as

active screen useexecutive functionsmedia exposurepassive screen usepreschool cognitive developmenttouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID40831575
PMCPMC7618025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.