Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831555›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025

The value of pregnancy-related factors in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.

Zhixun Yang, Hendrikus J A van Os, Janet M Kist, Rimke C Vos, Hedwig M M Vos, Niels H Chavannes, Annelieke H J Petrus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhixun YangDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Hendrikus J A van OsDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Janet M KistDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Rimke C VosDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Hedwig M M VosDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.
Annelieke H J PetrusDepartment of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333, ZA, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Pregnancy-related factors are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may help identify women at high cardiovascular risk. This study aims to provide an overview of prediction models for CVD which included pregnancy-related factors and to evaluate the impact of these factors on model performance. Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched until March 2023 for studies reporting on the development or validation of prediction models for CVD which included pregnancy-related factors. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS checklist. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. Results: Seven studies were included. C-indices ranged between 0.63 and 0.79. Adding pregnancy-related factors resulted in improved C-index in four studies, ranging from 0.0033 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.0022-0.0051) to 0.004 (95 % CI: 0.002-0.006). Net reclassification improvement (NRI) for events was improved in two studies, ranging from 0.01 (95 % CI: 0.003-0.02) to 0.038 (95 % CI: 0.003-0.074). NRI for non-events was improved in three studies, ranging from 0.002 (95 % CI: 0.0001-0.005) to 0.02 (95 % CI: 0.001-0.04). Two studies showed both low risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. Subgroup analyses by age in three studies indicated larger improvements in model performance in younger women. Conclusion: Addition of pregnancy-related factors results in limited improvements in performance of CVD prediction models, with relatively larger improvements in younger women.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseFemalePrediction modelPregnancyWomen

Identifiers

PMID40831555
PMCPMC12358648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.