Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831542›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2025

Fear of Happiness and Devaluation of Positive Climate Information in Climate-Concerned Individuals.

Sarah Simon, E Samuel Winer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah SimonDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research.
E Samuel WinerDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research.

Funding

Reward Devaluation, Positive Valence Systems Disturbance, and ImpairmentR15MH101573 · NIMH · NEW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY · PI E. Samuel Winer · 2014 to 2026
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH101573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward devaluation theory (RDT) describes the cognitive/affective process whereby people learn to interpret once-rewarding stimuli as threatening (Winer & Salem, 2016). RDT has advanced depression theory and science, but may also explain counterintuitive social phenomena, such as climate "doomerism" (Huber, 2020; Nightingale et al., 2020). The current experiment examined RDT in relation to climate values and beliefs. Participants were recruited in late 2022 from climate change-concerned social media groups. They completed a mixed-design experiment, with feedback to an imagined climate plan (positive, neutral) as the repeated measures independent variable, valence ratings regarding the feedback as dependent variables, and the RDT-related self-report measure fear of happiness (FHS) as the continuous between-subject variable. Results indicated the novel manipulation was successful. Critically, there was also a strong negative correlation between FHS and positive, but not neutral, condition ratings. These findings were predicted via RDT, and suggest that higher FHS predicts devaluation of positive information regarding the climate crisis--

Indexed as

climate changeenvironmental psychologyfear of happinessreward devaluationsocial justice

Identifiers

PMID40831542
PMCPMC12360452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.