ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2025
Risk of bleeding with dentoalveolar surgery in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local Hemostasis as the Critical Enabler for Safe Antithrombotic Therapy in Dentistry-Navigating Future Frontiers and Innovative Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the bleeding risks in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery who were on uninterrupted therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Methods: Electronic database searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through 28 September 2024, following PICOS criteria. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias. Data were pooled to estimate risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic and I Results: 29 studies enrolled a total of 29,212 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated a reduced risk of bleeding in patients receiving DOACs compared to those treated with VKAs (RR = 0.79, 95 % CI: 0.68-0.92, I Conclusions: Patients receiving DOACs or VKAs have an increased risk of bleeding during dentoalveolar surgery, but severe bleeding requiring hospitalization or causing irreversible damage is rare. Patients using DOACs appear to have a lower bleeding risk compared to those on VKAs. This difference is mainly observed in dabigatran etexilate, while it remains unclear in rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. Current quality of evidence is very low, which should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with higher quality of evidence are required to strengthen the validity of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.