Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831514›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025

Prognostic Nutritional Index is A Useful Predictive Marker for Morbidity and Mortality in Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.

Guangyu Jia, Kai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guangyu JiaDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Kai LiDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is a useful predictor of outcomes in surgical patients. Emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, the relationship between PNI and outcomes after PPU surgery has not been fully explored. This study aimed to assess the performance of PNI in predicting morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing surgery for PPU. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU between 2018 and 2023. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive performance of PNI was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: A total of 320 patients were included. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 26.6% and 17.8%, respectively. The PNI was significantly lower in patients who experienced morbidity or mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that a low PNI was an independent predictor of both morbidity (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.05 per-point decrease; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.01-1.10; Conclusion: PNI is a reliable predictor of morbidity and mortality following surgery for PPU. A PNI-guided risk assessment could be useful for the perioperative management of PPU patients.

Indexed as

morbiditymortalityperforated peptic ulcerprognostic nutritional indexsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40831514
PMCPMC12360380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.