ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Prognostic Nutritional Index is A Useful Predictive Marker for Morbidity and Mortality in Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Component-Level Prognostic Evaluation of Clinical, Inflammatory, and Renal-Protein Markers for 30-Day Mortality in Older Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- 30-day mortality prediction in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Incremental value of the prognostic nutritional index with ABC and Rockall scores.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Correlation between Prognostic Nutritional Index and Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Diabetes.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is a useful predictor of outcomes in surgical patients. Emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, the relationship between PNI and outcomes after PPU surgery has not been fully explored. This study aimed to assess the performance of PNI in predicting morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing surgery for PPU. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU between 2018 and 2023. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive performance of PNI was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: A total of 320 patients were included. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 26.6% and 17.8%, respectively. The PNI was significantly lower in patients who experienced morbidity or mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that a low PNI was an independent predictor of both morbidity (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.05 per-point decrease; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.01-1.10; Conclusion: PNI is a reliable predictor of morbidity and mortality following surgery for PPU. A PNI-guided risk assessment could be useful for the perioperative management of PPU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.