Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831507›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.

Benjamin Kuznets-Speck, Leon Schwartz, Hanxiao Sun, Madeline E Melzer, Nitu Kumari, Benjamin Haley, Ekta Prashnani, Suriyanarayanan Vaikuntanathan, Yogesh Goyal

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin Kuznets-SpeckDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.
Leon SchwartzDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.
Hanxiao SunDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2987-642X
Madeline E MelzerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.
Nitu KumariDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.
Benjamin HaleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Ekta PrashnaniNVIDIA, Santa Clara CA, USA.
Suriyanarayanan VaikuntanathanNSF-Simons National Institute for Theory and Mathematics in Biology, Chicago IL, USA.
Yogesh GoyalDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3502-6465

Funding

Elucidating biophysical mechanisms for force sensing and control using non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and AIR35GM147400 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Suriyanarayanan Vaikuntanathan · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooled single-cell perturbation screens represent powerful experimental platforms for functional genomics, yet interpreting these rich datasets for meaningful biological conclusions remains challenging. Most current methods fall at one of two extremes: either opaque deep learning models that obscure biological meaning, or simplified frameworks that treat genes as isolated units. As such, these approaches overlook a crucial insight: gene co-fluctuations in unperturbed cellular states can be harnessed to model perturbation responses. Here we present CIPHER (Covariance Inference for Perturbation and High-dimensional Expression Response), a conceptual framework leveraging linear response theory from statistical physics to predict transcriptome-wide perturbation outcomes using gene co-fluctuations in unperturbed cells. We validated CIPHER on synthetic regulatory networks before applying it to 11 large-scale single-cell perturbation datasets covering 4,234 perturbations and over 1.36M cells. CIPHER robustly recapitulated genome-wide responses to single and double perturbations by exploiting baseline gene covariance structure. Importantly, eliminating gene-gene covariances, while retaining gene-intrinsic variances, reduced model performance by 11-fold, demonstrating the rich information stored within baseline fluctuation structures. Moreover, gene-gene correlations transferred successfully across independent studies of the same cell type, revealing stereotypic fluctuation structures. Furthermore, CIPHER outperformed conventional differential expression metrics in identifying true perturbations while providing uncertainty-aware effect size estimates through Bayesian inference. Finally, most genome-wide responses propagated through the covariance matrix along approximately three independent and global gene modules. CIPHER underscores the importance of theoretically-grounded models in capturing complex biological responses, highlighting fundamental design principles encoded in cellular fluctuation patterns.

Indexed as

Bayesian statisticsfluctuationsgenome-wide responseslinear response theorysingle-cell perturbations

Identifiers

PMID40831507
PMCPMC12363937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.