ArticleClinical optometry2025
Low Vision Rehabilitation in a Family Affected by Peters' Anomaly Syndrome.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This report aims to discuss a case involving family members diagnosed with Peters' anomaly, detailing the clinical characteristics, vision assessment, and rehabilitation. Patients and Methods: A family comprises two daughters and a son, were diagnosed with Peters' anomaly. Assessment included: visual and reading acuity, visual field, contrast sensitivity, and color vision. Different devices were employed based on each individual's visual needs and capabilities. Results: The first daughter exhibited a visual acuity of 6/75 at distance and 6/95 at near in the better eye, along with a restricted visual field, moderate contrast sensitivity, and normal color vision. The second daughter had 6/60 visual acuity in both eyes, a restricted visual field, moderate contrast sensitivity, and abnormal color vision. Both girls were given a +12.00D binocular spectacle for near, and a telescope for distance, additionally, they were recommended to utilize a typoscope, felt pen, and reading stand for near tasks. The son had 6/75 vision at distance and near in both eyes, a restricted visual field, significantly reduced contrast sensitivity, and normal color vision. The son does not attend school; instead, he has been instructed in the use of a mobile phone application designed to magnify small print, and an 8x monocular telescope for distant viewing. He was also referred to a local organization that provides vocational training for young with disabilities. The father had 6/600 at distance and near in both eyes, a restricted visual field, severely reduced contrast sensitivity, and abnormal color vision. He received a video magnifier and advised to utilize bright illumination during reading and to use a cane while walking. The overwhelmed mother was referred to a counselling group for emotional support. Conclusion: In low vision-rehabilitation, various interventions may be recommended to patients with the same condition based on their age, visual function, and targeted goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.