ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Safety and effectiveness of the early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce antibiotic exposure in at-risk newborns: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05274776 (Safely Reduce Newborn Antibiotic Exposure With the Early-onset Sepsis Calculator), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safely Reduce Newborn Antibiotic Exposure With the Early-onset Sepsis Calculator: a Cluster Randomized Study (EOS Calculator RCT)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic stewardship in the context of management of early onset neonatal sepsis-an evolving paradigm shift.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure among neonates evaluated for suspected early-onset sepsis through an adapted risk-stratification and antimicrobial stewardship pathway in northwest Ethiopia: a prospective quality improvement study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: Clinical System Involvement and Maternal-Neonatal Risk Profiles in a Retrospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developing Clinical Decision (Support) Systems Combining the Scientific and Regulatory Perspective: European Insights on Challenges, Requirements, and Practical Guidance.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Newborns are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS), occurring 0.2-2.0 per 1000 live births, and for antibiotic overtreatment: approximately 5-15% receive antibiotics for suspected EOS under conventional guidelines with categorical risk factor assessment. Use of the multivariate neonatal EOS calculator prediction tool can reduce overtreatment, but no trials have been conducted to compare its safety to these categorical guidelines. Methods: Between April 12th, 2022, and March 19th, 2024, we conducted an open-label, two-armed, cluster-randomised controlled trial among newborns born at ≥34 weeks' gestational age with ≥1 EOS risk factor, comparing 10 hospitals randomised 1:1 to EOS calculator use versus categorical guideline use (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05274776). The EOS calculator was slightly adapted for Dutch use. The co-primary non-inferiority outcome assessed safety using four predefined harm criteria (respiratory support, circulatory support, referral to intensive care unit, and culture-confirmed EOS). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk did not exceed 1.5. The co-primary superiority outcome assessed the reduction of participants starting antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS within 24 h postpartum. Secondary endpoints were the duration of antibiotic therapy and the initiation of antibiotic therapy between 24 and 72 h after birth. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Findings: 1830 newborns (183 per cluster) were included. At least one harm criterion was present in 64 (7.0%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm and 134 (14.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (relative risk 0.48; 95% Cl 0.36-0.63). Antibiotics for suspected EOS were started in 66 (7.2%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm, compared with 243 (26.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (absolute risk reduction: 19.0%, 95% CI 11.3-26.7). Median duration of antibiotics was longer in the EOS calculator arm (5.5 days, IQR 1.8-6.6) than in the categorical guideline arm (2.1 days, IQR 1.6-6.3) (P 0.0019). We found no difference in the proportion of newborns started on antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS between 24 and 72 h after birth. Adverse event rates were similar between arms. Readmission for suspected early-onset sepsis occurred three times in the EOS calculator and two times in the categorical guideline arm. Any cultures obtained at readmission remained negative, and any symptoms resolved completely. Interpretation: These trial data support safety and effectiveness of the EOS calculator for harm criteria and for the proportion of participants that started antibiotic therapy. Funding: This study was supported by SPIN, the General Paediatrics Research Network of the Dutch Association for Paediatrics, supported by het Cultuurfonds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.