Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831464›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Safety and effectiveness of the early-onset sepsis calculator to reduce antibiotic exposure in at-risk newborns: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Bo M van der Weijden, Sanne W C M Janssen, Marijke C van der Weide, Renske J P M Cornelisse-van Vugt, Gavin W Ten Tusscher, Claire A M Lutterman, Arvid W A Kamps, Carmen M Lorente Flores, Jeroen Hol, Henriëtte van Laerhoven and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05274776 (Safely Reduce Newborn Antibiotic Exposure With the Early-onset Sepsis Calculator), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05274776 naunknown statusnot on this map

Safely Reduce Newborn Antibiotic Exposure With the Early-onset Sepsis Calculator: a Cluster Randomized Study (EOS Calculator RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorprof. dr. Frans B. PlötzRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,830ConditionsEarly-Onset Sepsis, Neonatal, EOSArmsEOS calculator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Bo M van der WeijdenDepartment of Paediatrics, Tergooi MC, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Sanne W C M JanssenDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marijke C van der WeideDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Renske J P M Cornelisse-van VugtDepartment of Paediatrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Gavin W Ten TusscherDepartment of Paediatrics, Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, the Netherlands.
Claire A M LuttermanDepartment of Paediatrics, FlevoHospital, Almere, the Netherlands.
Arvid W A KampsDepartment of Paediatrics, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Carmen M Lorente FloresDepartment of Paediatrics, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Jeroen HolDepartment of Paediatrics, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Henriëtte van LaerhovenDepartment of Paediatrics, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maarten RijpertDepartment of Paediatrics, Zaans MC, Zaandam, the Netherlands.
Nadia A OeijDepartment of Paediatrics, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.
Irene A M SchieringDepartment of Paediatrics, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Sylvia A Obermann-BorstCare4Neo, Neonatal Patient and Parent Advocacy Organisation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Douwe H VisserDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lisanne M van LeeuwenDepartment of Paediatrics, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
René F KornelisseDepartment of Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Annemarie M C van RossumDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Merijn W BijlsmaDepartment of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frans B PlötzDepartment of Paediatrics, Tergooi MC, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Niek B AchtenDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newborns are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS), occurring 0.2-2.0 per 1000 live births, and for antibiotic overtreatment: approximately 5-15% receive antibiotics for suspected EOS under conventional guidelines with categorical risk factor assessment. Use of the multivariate neonatal EOS calculator prediction tool can reduce overtreatment, but no trials have been conducted to compare its safety to these categorical guidelines. Methods: Between April 12th, 2022, and March 19th, 2024, we conducted an open-label, two-armed, cluster-randomised controlled trial among newborns born at ≥34 weeks' gestational age with ≥1 EOS risk factor, comparing 10 hospitals randomised 1:1 to EOS calculator use versus categorical guideline use (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05274776). The EOS calculator was slightly adapted for Dutch use. The co-primary non-inferiority outcome assessed safety using four predefined harm criteria (respiratory support, circulatory support, referral to intensive care unit, and culture-confirmed EOS). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relative risk did not exceed 1.5. The co-primary superiority outcome assessed the reduction of participants starting antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS within 24 h postpartum. Secondary endpoints were the duration of antibiotic therapy and the initiation of antibiotic therapy between 24 and 72 h after birth. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Findings: 1830 newborns (183 per cluster) were included. At least one harm criterion was present in 64 (7.0%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm and 134 (14.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (relative risk 0.48; 95% Cl 0.36-0.63). Antibiotics for suspected EOS were started in 66 (7.2%) of 915 in the EOS calculator arm, compared with 243 (26.6%) of 915 in the categorical guideline arm (absolute risk reduction: 19.0%, 95% CI 11.3-26.7). Median duration of antibiotics was longer in the EOS calculator arm (5.5 days, IQR 1.8-6.6) than in the categorical guideline arm (2.1 days, IQR 1.6-6.3) (P 0.0019). We found no difference in the proportion of newborns started on antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS between 24 and 72 h after birth. Adverse event rates were similar between arms. Readmission for suspected early-onset sepsis occurred three times in the EOS calculator and two times in the categorical guideline arm. Any cultures obtained at readmission remained negative, and any symptoms resolved completely. Interpretation: These trial data support safety and effectiveness of the EOS calculator for harm criteria and for the proportion of participants that started antibiotic therapy. Funding: This study was supported by SPIN, the General Paediatrics Research Network of the Dutch Association for Paediatrics, supported by het Cultuurfonds.

Indexed as

Early-onset sepsisEarly-onset sepsis calculatorEOSNeonatal sepsis calculator

Identifiers

PMID40831464
PMCPMC12359153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.