Observational studyAnnals of African medicine2026
Comparison of End-tidal Capnography, Chest Auscultation, and Upper Airway Ultrasonography for Rapid Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement by Trainees among Patients Requiring Intubation for General Anesthesia.
Observational study in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnsuring proper endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is crucial during general anesthesia. Traditional confirmation methods include capnography and chest auscultation, but each has limitations. Ultrasound (USG) offers real-time visualization of ETT placement, potentially improving confirmation speed and accuracy.
objectivesTo compare the feasibility of USG for early detection of esophageal intubation against capnography and chest auscultation in trainees. METHODOLOGY: This comparative observational study assessed the time for ETT placement confirmation using USG, capnography, and chest auscultation in 90 patients undergoing general anesthesia. Patients were divided into three groups: USG confirmation (Group A), capnography confirmation using the first or sixth waveform (Group B), and chest auscultation confirmation (Group C).
resultsGroup A had the fastest confirmation time (32.1 s), followed by Group C (bilateral: 46.97 s), and Group B (6th waveform: 48.23 s). Statistically significant differences were observed between Group A and Group B (6 th waveform), and Group A and Group C (bilateral). Hemodynamic parameters showed significant changes during and after intubation compared to baseline.
conclusionsUSG emerged as a faster and potentially more reliable method for ETT placement confirmation compared to capnography and chest auscultation. The real-time visualization offered by USG is valuable for novice trainees, enabling rapid confirmation, and potentially improving patient safety by facilitating early detection of misplacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.