ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026
Perception of Congenital Cataract among Saudi Parents in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Perception of Congenital Cataract among Saudi Parents in Saudi Arabia.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to assess the awareness of congenital cataract among parents in Saudi Arabia.
settingNationwide study conducted in Saudi Arabia.
designThis was a cross-sectional study. STUDY METHODOLOGY: The target demographic consists of parents in Saudi Arabia; each participant anonymously completed the Google Forms questionnaire. Saudi citizens who are parents and have consented to participate in the study all met the requirements for inclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria included individuals without children, non-Saudi citizens, and those refusing to take part in the study. Data were analyzed using a statistical package for social science (SPSS).
resultsOut of 1554 participants, 1422 have met the inclusion criteria. A majority (58.31%) have heard of congenital cataract before taking the survey. With most respondents (56.09%) able to identify it as the opacification of the eye lens, while a significant number (31.45%) are unsure. A substantial proportion of respondents (59.96%) believe that congenital cataract can be cured. Participants of the female gender ( P = 0.016), aged above 60 ( P < 0.01), and people with diplomas or higher educational degrees ( P = 0.019 and < 0.01) were more aware about congenital cataracts and its treatment.
conclusionOur study shows that parents in Saudi Arabia have an adequate understanding and awareness about congenital cataract and its treatment. However, awareness and educational programs regarding congenital cataracts are recommended to further improve their understanding of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.