Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831239›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Victorian Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Mental Health Reform: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Louise Alexander, Adam Searby, Cally Mills, Russell James, Whitney Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise AlexanderDeakin University, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-1476
Adam SearbyMonash University, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Clayton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-3221
Cally MillsDeakin University, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Australia.
Russell JamesUniversity of Tasmania, School of Nursing, College of Health & Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-5586
Whitney JohnsonAlfred Hospital, Mental and Addiction Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The state of Victoria, Australia is currently in a period of mental health reform, spurred on by a recent damning Royal Commission and updates to legislation. New legislation promotes the choices and rights of consumers in the mental health system, including recommendations to eliminate seclusion by 2030. While much of this reform has been met with enthusiasm by consumer groups and nurses alike, there remains uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to describe the experiences and perceptions of mental health nurses on mental health reform in the State of Victoria, Australia. Adopting a qualitative descriptive method, mental health nurses (n = 14) working in public mental health services in Victoria undertook individual interviews, with data thematically analysed. After analysis, three themes were identified: Navigating the new Act: Overcoming Managing challenges faced by mental health nurses, Defusing the storm: Mental health nurses' safety concerns under the new Act, and Workforce strain and organisational value: The impact on mental health nurses. Nurses described distress at working in a system with increasing occupational pressures and expressed concern that the goal to eliminate seclusion by 2030 may not be achievable due to current system constraints and deficits. They also highlighted legislative barriers that prioritised consumer preferences over clinical judgement, which they perceived as contributing to a decline in consumer wellbeing and, in some cases, serious adverse outcomes. While mental health reform is essential to improving care, it must also consider the practical and emotional demands placed on clinicians within evolving legislative frameworks. This study identified that the implementation of mental health reform requires a consistent approach by health services and government that promotes the needs of consumers whilst also balancing the significant workplace stressors that nurses encounter. Plans to eliminate restrictive practices need to adopt a consistent, collaborative approach that recognises the complexity of current challenges and the importance of thoughtfully addressing the underlying factors, rather than simply removing existing responses.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Care ReformMental Health ServicesPsychiatric NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchVictoriamental health legislationmental health nursingmental health reformoccupational violence and aggressionqualitative descriptive methodseclusionworkforce

Identifiers

PMID40831239
PMCPMC12365580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.