Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831226›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.

Iztok Hozo, Gordon Guyatt, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vector control strategies for preventing dengue transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iztok HozoDepartment of Mathematics, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, Indiana, USA.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin DjulbegovicDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-1447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND

objectivesWe have recently succeeded in integrating evidence estimation with decision-analytical frameworks, thereby addressing a major challenge in advancing the science of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and clinical practice guidelines. However, the primary output of our analysis was expressed as net differences in expected utility (ΔEU) between competing treatment interventions. Although expected utility is a standard decision-analytic metric, it is not intuitively understood by most clinicians. Here, we demonstrate how ΔEU can be converted into gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life expectancy (LE).

methodsWe begin with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) Summary of Findings (SoF) tables-the primary outputs of systematic reviews that underpin guideline recommendations-to generate ΔEU, which we subsequently convert into QALY and LE gains using the DEALE (Declining Exponential Approximation of Life Expectancy) method. We also integrate patients' values and preferences by relating minimal important differences (MIDs)-the smallest change in an outcome that patients perceive as important enough to justify a change in management-to relative values, which reflect the preference (or weight) assigned to avoiding a specific health outcome compared to the worst outcome (mortality). To convert a deterministic ΔEU model into a probabilistic one, we employ Monte Carlo simulation to assess the credibility of recommendations under the evidentiary uncertainty included in the SoF tables. We also provide a method to assess the impact of the certainty of evidence (CoE) on the robustness of the results.

resultsWe developed a user-friendly, Excel-based calculator for converting evidence-based SoF tables into ΔEU, and subsequently into QALY and LE gains. We illustrate our methods by comparing the effects of short-term versus indefinite anticoagulation for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The complete analysis can be performed in approximately 5-10 min.

conclusionWe extend our methods to link estimation metrics commonly used in the EBM field with decision-analytic metrics such as expected utility, QALY, and LE. We present a user-friendly calculator that integrates all key domains underpinning contemporary guideline development.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesEvidence-Based MedicineLife ExpectancyQuality-Adjusted Life YearsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicBayesian statisticsdecision analysesdecision makingevidence‐based medicinefrequentist statisticsGRADEguidelinesinferences

Identifiers

PMID40831226
PMCPMC12365584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.