ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Use of a lidocaine impregnated band improved behavioral and physiological indicators of pain during tail docking in lambs.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tail docking improves hygiene, reduces flystrike, and enhances efficiency for routine husbandry practices such as shearing, serving as an important management practice that promotes sheep health. However, the procedure is known to cause acute stress and discomfort, raising animal welfare concerns. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a lidocaine-impregnated band at mitigating pain associated with tail docking newborn lambs. Thirty-two lambs were randomly assigned to receive a lidocaine-impregnated rubber O-ring band (LB; n = 16) or a non-medicated standard O-ring band (CON; n = 16). An elastrator was used to place CON and LB rings below the third caudal vertebrae for docking lambs at 3 d of life. At -1 h, 0 h, 2 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 7 d, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d, behavioral observations, pressure algometry, infrared thermography, and blood collection were performed. From birth to 30 d of age, daily weights were collected and used to determine growth and average daily gain (ADG). There was a band-by-time interaction for behavioral response at the time of banding (0 h), in which LB lambs exhibited fewer (P < 0.05) painful behaviors compared to CON. LB lambs had greater (P < 0.05) mechanical nociceptive thresholds below the site of docking compared to CON lambs, while thresholds above the banding site and at the control site did not differ. Thermal imaging revealed no temperature differences between LB and CON lambs at any timepoint or location. There was a treatment by time interaction where LB lambs had decreased (P < 0.05) haptoglobin levels 2 d post banding compared to CON lambs. The first 30 d performance did not differ between groups when evaluated as growth or ADG. The length of time until the tail fell off did not differ between treatments. These results indicate that lidocaine bands reduce initial pain response, tissue sensitivity, and help resolve the acute phase response faster than traditional bands, minimizing discomfort and stress while still achieving tail docking in the same amount of time. Thus, LBs may serve as a simple tool for livestock producers to incorporate into their standard management practices to enhance animal welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.