Trial reportClinical gerontologist
Feasibility of Implementing the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) Program in an Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical gerontologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Individualized Positive Psychosocial Intervention (IPPI) is an evidence-based program that engages people living with dementia (PLWD) in brief (i.e. 10 minute) one-to-one preference-based activities two times a week. This study evaluated the feasibility of pragmatically implementing a pilot embedded pragmatic clinical trial of the IPPI program in nine nursing homes.
methodsFeasibility was defined as the ability of NH communities to establish implementation champions and an implementation team, complete training, identify and enroll eligible residents, match IPPI protocols to residents' stated preferences, complete an average of two IPPIs per week per resident for 6 months, and complete IPPIs with fidelity.
resultsSeven NHs completed the project, enrolling a total of 130 eligible residents. Seventy staff were trained. Staff identified preferences, corresponding IPPIs, and a targeted symptom of distress for all enrolled residents. Staff completed an average of 44.71 IPPIs per person (over six months) for those that did not pass away or discharge, with an average of 3.91 days between IPPIs. All staff reached at least 80% intervention delivery fidelity. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The IPPI program is a feasible nonpharmacologic intervention for PLWD that can be implemented with fidelity over time in nursing homes by staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.