Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831147›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2025

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Prussian White and NVP/C-Based Sodium-Ion Batteries Based on Primary Laboratory Data.

Friedrich B Jasper, Manuel J Baumann, Hüseyin Ersoy, Anna Smith, Sebastian Büchele, Nicole Bohn, Joachim R Binder, Dirk Holger Neuhaus, Marcel Weil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Friedrich B JasperInstitute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), KIT, 76021, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2208-8071
Manuel J BaumannInstitute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), KIT, 76021, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-4624
Hüseyin ErsoyInstitute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), KIT, 76021, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Anna SmithInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM), KIT, 76344, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sebastian BücheleInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM), KIT, 76344, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Nicole BohnInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM), KIT, 76344, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Joachim R BinderInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM), KIT, 76344, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Dirk Holger NeuhausDepartment of Sustainable Systems Engineering (INATECH), University Freiburg, 79110, Germany.
Marcel WeilInstitute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), KIT, 76021, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-9990

Funding

German Research Foundation (DFG) 390874152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are considered the most promising candidate for electrochemical storage after lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) to meet the globally growing energy storage demand. Assessments to identify environmental hotspots and address them in further development at regular intervals are inevitable to ensure low environmental impact of SIBs in the future. However, the number of studies assessing the environmental impacts of SIBs is limited, and existing studies are mostly based on theoretical models and few limited sources. This study is one of the few to provide life cycle inventory data from actual production processes of SIBs, allowing for hotspot analysis of environmental impacts. A comparative life cycle assessment of two emerging SIB technologies is conducted based on primary laboratory data, focusing on the synthesis of the two cathode active materials (CAMs), sodium vanadium phosphate (NVP/C), and a Prussian white (PW). The results show that the impacts of NVP/C-based pouch cells are significantly higher than the PW-based cells in all impact categories due to lower gravimetric energy densities and higher CAM synthesis-related impacts. To ensure the correct order of magnitude a benchmark NMC-based LIB is assessed at the same laboratory, showing lower impacts than both SIBs, due to higher gravimetric energy densities.

Indexed as

life cycle assessmentprimary dataprussian whitesodium‐ion batterysodium vanadium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID40831147
PMCPMC12456382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.