Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831087›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2025

Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Era: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.

Takuhisa Nukaya, Kiyoshi Takahara, Shingo Toyoda, Lan Inoki, Wataru Fukuokaya, Keiichiro Mori, Takehiro Iwata, Kensuke Bekku, Ryoichi Maenosono, Takuya Tsujino and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Role of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Era: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Takuhisa NukayaDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9902-1694
Kiyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-2074
Shingo ToyodaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Lan InokiDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Wataru FukuokayaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-912X
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-6569
Takehiro IwataDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-543X
Kensuke BekkuDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-1592
Ryoichi MaenosonoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-5484
Takuya TsujinoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Yosuke HirasawaDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-4888
Takafumi YanagisawaDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazumasa KomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Motoo ArakiDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-2482
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshio OhnoDepartment of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-3932
Ryoichi ShirokiDepartment of Urology, Fujita-Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and determine the optimal timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy.

methodsThis retrospective study reviewed medical records of 447 patients with mRCC treated with ICI at multiple Japanese institutions between January 2018 and August 2023. From this cohort, 178 patients with lymph node or distant metastases received either cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN group; n = 72) or ICI therapy without cytoreductive nephrectomy (non-CN group; n = 106) as first-line treatment.

resultsMedian progression-free survival was 15.7 months, and median overall survival was 58.1 months. CN significantly improved OS, with the CN group's median OS not reached, compared to 29.6 months in the non-CN group (p = 0.01). Deferred CN also showed improved survival outcomes. Poor prognostic factors for immediate CN included International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium poor risk, sarcomatoid differentiation, and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

conclusionsWe developed a prognostic model to guide patient selection for CN, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscytoreductive nephrectomyIMDC classificationimmune checkpoint inhibitorneutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratiosarcomatoid differentiation

Identifiers

PMID40831087
PMCPMC12586762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.