Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40831045›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effects of shade and chromium propionate supplementation during gestation of beef cows under heat stress: cow thermotolerance, cow-calf performance, and physiological responses.

Matheus L Ferreira, Marcelo Vedovatto, Isabelle P Siqueira, Hiam Marcon, Bárbara R Dos Reis, Ronaldo G Silva Junior, João V Chinaglia, Luciana N Renno, Ashley K Edwards

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matheus L FerreiraHill Farm Research Station, Louisiana State University, Homer, LA, 71040, USA.
Marcelo VedovattoDean Lee Research and Extension Center, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA, 71302, USA.
Isabelle P SiqueiraHill Farm Research Station, Louisiana State University, Homer, LA, 71040, USA.
Hiam MarconDean Lee Research and Extension Center, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA, 71302, USA.
Bárbara R Dos ReisWhite Sand Beef Unit, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS, 39470, USA.
Ronaldo G Silva JuniorDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
João V ChinagliaDean Lee Research and Extension Center, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA, 71302, USA.
Luciana N RennoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
Ashley K EdwardsDean Lee Research and Extension Center, Louisiana State University, Alexandria, LA, 71302, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of providing or not providing maternal access to shade and chromium (Cr) propionate supplementation for beef cows under heat stress conditions on cow-calf performance, thermotolerance, and physiological responses. Seventy-two Angus-cross cows were stratified by body weight (BW; 566 ± 5.38 kg) and body condition score (BCS; 6.3 ± 0.5) and allocated to 1 of 12 bermudagrass pastures (3 to 5 ha pastures/5 to 7 cows per pasture). Treatments were randomly assigned to pastures in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: shade and Cr (SCr), no shade and Cr (NSCr), shade and no Cr (SNCr) and no shade and no Cr (NSNCr), from day 0 to 180 (on average 150 ± 20 d prepartum and 30 ± 10 d post-partum). Chromium propionate was added to the mineral mix at a rate of 1.8% of the total mineral mixture on a weight basis (Cr target intake of 6.3 mg/cow/d). Data was analyzed on SAS as a 2 × 2 factorial design with pasture considered the experimental unit. The SCr cows showed greater BW on days 90 and 120 compared to all other treatments (P = 0.04). Shaded cows had greater BCS on days 30, 60, and 120 (P < 0.001). Supplementation of Cr increased Cr liver concentration of cows (P = 0.05), but not in calves (P = 0.14). Calves born from no-shaded cows showed lower vigor score at birth (P < 0.02) and were lighter at birth and weaning (P < 0.001). Shaded cows had reduced respiration rate (RR) on days 45, 75, and 90, but cows supplemented with Cr showed increased RR on these days (P < 0.01). Shade reduced cows' overall body temperature and rectal temperature (P < 0.001). Shade reduced overall intravaginal temperature (IT), but NSCr cows showed the greatest IT from 0900 to 1800 hours between treatments on days 60 and 90 (P ≤ 0.04). No-shade cows tended to have increased glucose concentrations on days 30, 90, and 120 (P < 0.0001), and increased non-esterified fatty acids concentrations on days 90 and 120 (P < 0.01). Cows supplemented with Cr had reduced total proteins, globulins, and creatinine (P ≤ 0.03) and tended to have reduced glucose concentrations (P = 0.10). NSCr cows had greater serum urea N concentrations on days 30 and 60 compared to NSNCr (P < 0.001). Total protein, globulins, and IgG tended to be greater for calves born from shaded cows (P ≤ 0.10). Shade improved dam performance, thermotolerance and calf vigor, immunity, and growth. Chromium enhanced pre- and postpartum BW, but only when shade was provided. Chromium supplementation did not improve thermotolerance but enhanced physiological responses.

Indexed as

ChromiumPropionatesThermotoleranceAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsFemaleHeat-Shock ResponseHot TemperaturePregnancyRandom AllocationChromiumPropionatespropionic acidfetal programminggrazingheat abatementprepartumtrace mineral

Identifiers

PMID40831045
PMCPMC12399805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.