ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Tube-Fed vs Orally-Fed Children with Early Childhood Feeding Disorders.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with feeding disorders may require tube feeding when oral intake is insufficient. This study compared the clinical management and parental experiences of tube-fed children versus orally-fed children with feeding disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 22 children under 3 years old diagnosed with feeding disorders, treated at the Early Childhood Eating and Sleeping Disorders Clinic, between July 2018 and December 2020. Eleven tube-fed children were matched with 11 orally-fed children based on age and sex. Data were collected from medical records, parental questionnaires, and clinical documentation. Parental mood, stress levels, and perceived social support were assessed via validated self-report measures. RESULTS Significantly different aspects of coping were found in the parental group of tube-fed children. The need for occupational therapy and psychological consultation only occurred in the tube-fed group. The tube-fed group had more visits at the clinic. These parents were less satisfied with their child's development and generally felt less successful in coping with the difficulties. They felt they had been less supported by their social environment than parents in the control group. CONCLUSIONS The management of tube-fed children primarily focuses on the child. However, these cases are more efficiently managed with multidisciplinary teamwork and with the active involvement of parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.