ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Targeting everyday decision makers in research: early career researcher and patient and public involvement and engagement collaboration in an AI-in-healthcare project.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is critical in the development and application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare research to ensure that outcomes align with patients' and the public's needs. However, current PPIE practices often limit involvement to reactive tasks such as reviewing documents and providing plain English summaries. Whilst important, this approach can sideline PPIE from influencing key research decisions. Consequently, PPIE interactions often fail to adequately reach and influence everyday decision makers. On AI and big data research projects, these decisions are often made by Early Career Researchers (ECRs) who play a vital role in the day-to-day research process. After realising these limitations, and to address them, the NIHR-funded AI MULTIPLY consortium introduced twice-monthly "ECRs meet PPIE" sessions. These sessions began in May 2024 and enabled ECRs to present and discuss work in progress and gain targeted input from PPIE members during early phases of research, such as research direction, data and variable selection. By integrating PPIE at this stage, the project aimed to improve the relevance and impact of the healthcare research but also provide ECRs with essential skills in public engagement. At time of writing, 12 sessions have been conducted. Through ethnographic observations integrated with internal surveys, the findings show how the sessions were developed, overcame challenges, and helped to embed PPIE contributors' voices into an AI-in-healthcare project. Based on our findings we have identified 5 recommendations for other large interdisciplinary consortia to strengthen the contribution of PPIE to everyday decision-making in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.