ArticleBMC medicine2025
Dynamic OGTT-derived C-peptide trajectories for metabolic heterogeneity and adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a nested case‒control study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of first-trimester inflammatory markers with gestational diabetes mellitus subtypes and patterns: a cohort study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Umbilical Cord Biomarkers of Nutritional and Metabolic Status in Neonates with Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Serum β2-microglobulin, cystatin-C, and urinary KIM-1 as predictors of early renal impairment in women with diabetes in pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Thyroid markers in early to mid-pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a longitudinal retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExisting diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) rely solely on glucose thresholds, which are insufficient to capture metabolic heterogeneity. We aimed to evaluate the role of C-peptide measured during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in assisting the development of stratified treatment strategies and predicting the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
methodsThis nested case-control study conducted within the Xi'an Longitudinal Mother-Child Cohort included 1014 pregnant women with GDM and 1014 without GDM (non-GDM) who delivered singleton live-born infants between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. C-peptide levels were measured at three intervals during the OGTT. Latent class trajectory modeling was used to identify distinct C-peptide trajectories, and logistic regression was used to assess their associations with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes.
resultsTwo principal C-peptide trajectories were identified in GDM despite similar glucose profiles. GDM Class 1 (771, 76.04%) presented a delayed 120-min C-peptide peak and poorer beta-cell secretion, whereas GDM Class 2 (243, 23.96%) presented a sharp 60-min peak followed by a decline and significantly increased insulin resistance, with greater risks of delivering large for gestational age (LGA) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.15) and macrosomia (aOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.97). Surprisingly, 21.7% (220) of the non-GDM group had a high C-peptide response associated with elevated preeclampsia risk (aOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.25-6.74).
conclusionsDynamic OGTT-derived C-peptide trajectories revealed clinically significant metabolic subgroups of GDM that were obscured by glucose-only diagnostics, with the predominantly insulin-resistant Class being at higher risk of fetal overgrowth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.