ArticleBMC nursing2025
Clinical nurses' evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: a regional cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current status of innovative behaviors among nurses in public hospitals and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-Based Healthcare is essential for enhancing the quality of care and improving patient outcomes in contemporary healthcare. As the largest professional group in the healthcare sector, nurses are critical in all phases of the EBHC process. The purpose of the study was to investigate clinical nurses' evidence-based healthcare competence and explore the associated factors.
methodsFrom July to October 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 531 clinical nurses recruited from hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, utilizing convenience sampling. All the collected data were analyzed descriptively, and independent samples t-test, adjusted t-test, one-way ANOVA, Welch ANOVA, Pearson's correlation test, and multiple linear regression were employed to explore the associated factors.
resultsIn total, 531 valid questionnaires were collected. The average item score of evidence-based healthcare competence among these nurses was (2.92 ± 0.78) points. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that English literature reading ability, frequency of literature reading, workload, the number of types of evidence-based training programs they participated in, and whether they had applied for patents influenced the evidence-based healthcare competence of clinical nurses.
conclusionClinical nurses exhibit varying levels of evidence-based healthcare competence, with strengths in evidence transfer and implementation but room for improvement in evidence generation and synthesis. The identified factors provide valuable insights for developing targeted interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.