Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830938›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Determinants and geographic distribution of unimproved sanitation facilities in sub-Saharan Africa, spatial and multilevel analysis using demographic and health survey (DHS) data.

Lidetu Demoze, Mitkie Tigabie, Eshetu Abera Worede, Helen Brhan, Zemichael Gizaw, Amensisa Hailu Tesfaye, Gelila Yitageasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lidetu DemozeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. lidetudemoze12@gmail.com.
Mitkie TigabieDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Eshetu Abera WoredeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Helen BrhanDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Zemichael GizawDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Amensisa Hailu TesfayeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Gelila YitageasuDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-third of the population in sub-Saharan Africa does not have access to adequate hygiene and sanitation facilities. Many still lack decent and functional toilets, impacting health, dignity, and development. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the geographical distribution and factors associated with unimproved sanitation facilities in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsThis study used Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 500,845 households within 20,492 clusters across 34 sub-Saharan African countries, which were weighted, cleaned, and analysed using STATA version 17. Spatial analyses were conducted using ArcGIS software version 10.7 and Kulldorff's SaTScan software version 10.1. Multilevel analysis was employed to identify contributing factors, with associations presented as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (p < 0.05).

resultsSignificant spatial clustering and hotspots of unimproved sanitation facilities were identified within sub-Saharan Africa. The magnitude of unimproved sanitation facilities in sub-Saharan Africa was 48.88% (95% CI: 48.74-49.02%). The magnitude of unimproved sanitation was lowest in Malawi at 16.70% and highest in Chad at 88.52%. Several individual and community level factors were significantly associated with the utilization of unimproved sanitation facilities. At the individual level, female-headed households and those with access to improved drinking water source were less likely to use unimproved sanitation. In contrast, households headed by individuals aged 11-35 and 36-50 years, divorced households, and households with more than four members were associated with greater use of unimproved sanitation facilities. Additionally, households in the poorest, poorer, middle, and richer wealth categories were also associated with a greater use of unimproved sanitation facilities. Furthermore, households with water sources located in the yard/plot and off-premises had higher odds of using unimproved sanitation. At the community level, rural residence and lack of media exposure were associated with greater use of unimproved sanitation facilities.

conclusionUnimproved sanitation facilities remain a major public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, with significant regional disparities and a 48% magnitude. Addressing this issue requires targeted government policies, financial support for sanitation infrastructure, improved water supply, hygiene awareness campaigns, increased media exposure, and better sanitation facilities in rural areas.

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaDemographyFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisSpatial AnalysisYoung AdultDeterminantsSanitation facilitiesSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40830938
PMCPMC12366091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.