ArticleBMC public health2025
Analysis of factors driving HPV vaccination coverage and associated cost savings in the united States.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An exploratory study to determine the feasibility and processes needed to implement the Immunization Neighborhood to increase HPV vaccination among African American adolescents and adolescents in the general population: A multi-partner perspective.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Achieving Cancer Prevention Equity: A Policy Analysis of American Cancer Society HPV Vaccination Guidelines.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- An Analysis of Multilevel Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake Among Rural U.S. Adolescents.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Changed Trends in Utilization and Substitution Pattern of Non-National Immunization Program Vaccines in Central China, 2011-2024.Vaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States (U.S.) and has a significant healthcare burden and cost due to HPV-related cancers and diseases. Despite the proven safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine, its uptake in the U.S remains suboptimal. Furthermore, the combined influence of individual, social, and policy factors on HPV vaccination rates remains unclear. This study investigated how individual, social, and policy factors affect HPV vaccination rates, focusing on initiation and completion rates in the U.S. It also aimed to assess the potential cost savings from implementing certain recommended policy changes, aiming to boost HPV vaccination rates and subsequently lower HPV-related cancer cases.
methodsWe analyzed publicly available data on population demographics (e.g., children's public insurance coverage status, parental education, and rurality), policy, and access (e.g., Medicaid income eligibility criteria for children, state-level vaccine requirement, vaccine exemption status, access to pediatricians, access to Vaccine for Children (VFC) providers, and meningococcal conjugate vaccine uptake among adolescents) to quantify the impact of these factors on HPV vaccination coverage using a multilevel regression analysis. Using the regression results, we conducted a cost-savings analysis of higher HPV vaccine uptake and reduced HPV-related cancer incidence resulting from policy changes.
resultsThe results revealed that meningococcal vaccination uptake, Medicaid income eligibility among children, parental education, and public insurance coverage increased HPV vaccination initiation by 0.028-0.53% points, and completion by 0.033-0.63% points. Vaccine requirements, rurality, and the COVID-19 mortality rate were negatively associated with uptake. Increasing meningococcal conjugate vaccine uptake by 1%, broadening Medicaid income eligibility criteria to 200% of the Federal Poverty Line for states below the threshold, and adding one pediatrician and VFC provider per 100,000 children could collectively reduce national direct two-year cancer treatment expenditures by $19 million to $24 million.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that improving policy and access factors could significantly increase HPV vaccination coverage and generate cost savings. Future research should incorporate long-term and indirect costs to capture the full-scale cost savings related to HPV vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.