ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Bacterial isolates and antibiotic resistance in critically ill sepsis patients at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extensively drug-resistant ESBL-producing enterobacterales and coexisting antimicrobial resistance genes are associated with mortality in critically ill patients with cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Burden of sepsis in China: a systematic analysis from 1990 to 2021.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a pressing global public health issue, particularly among patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), and it is linked to a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Current understanding of bacterial profiles, antibiotic resistance patterns, and the magnitude of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) and Carbapenemase (CP) producing isolates in critically ill patients is vital for implementing strong management approaches tailored to combat antibiotic resistance and improve patient outcomes.
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was carried out involving 149 patients admitted to ICU with a presumptive diagnosis of sepsis at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC) from October 2023 to October 2024. A structured questionnaire was administered to collect baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. Blood samples were aseptically collected and analyzed using standard microbiological technique to identify bacterial isolates. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was employed to conduct the antimicrobial susceptibility test. The MASTDISCS
resultsBacterial pathogens were isolated from 33 patients, representing an isolation rate of 22.1% (95% CI: 16.2-29.6%). Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) accounted for the majority of the isolates, 25/33 (75.8%), with Escherichia coli, 6/25 (24%) being the predominant species. Administering antibiotics before sample collection was associated with a lower likelihood of culture positivity (AOR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.38; p = 0.004). In contrast, prolonged stay in the ICU was positively associated with culture positivity (AOR: 1.13, 95% CI:1.02-1.24; p = 0.02). Gram-negative bacteria exhibited a particularly high resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, ranging from 66.7 to 80%. ESBL and CP producers accounted for 11/25 (44%) and 12/25(48%) of GNB, respectively. Additionally, 80% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin resistant. Overall, about a third of all isolates, 11/33 (33.3%) were multidrug resistant strains.
conclusionsThe study shows a significant burden of MDR pathogens among critically ill sepsis patients, characterized by high prevalence of ESBL, CP, and MRSA. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention strategies to curb resistance in ICU environments. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.