Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830833›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Autoencoders with shared and specific embeddings for multi-omics data integration.

Chao Wang, Michael J O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao WangBen May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, 929 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Michael J O'ConnellDepartment of Statistics, Miami University, 105 Tallawanda Rd., Oxford, OH, 45056, USA. oconnemj@miamioh.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cancer research, different levels of high-dimensional data are often collected for the same subjects. Effective integration of these data by considering the shared and specific information from each data source can help us better understand different types of cancer.

resultsIn this study we propose a novel autoencoder (AE) structure with explicitly defined orthogonal loss between the shared and specific embeddings to integrate different data sources. We compare our model with previously proposed AE structures based on simulated data and real cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using simulations with different proportions of differentially expressed genes, we compare the performance of AE methods for subsequent classification tasks. We also compare the model performance with a commonly used dimension reduction method, joint and individual variance explained (JIVE). In terms of reconstruction loss, our proposed AE models with orthogonal constraints have a slightly better reconstruction loss. All AE models achieve higher classification accuracy than the original features, demonstrating the usefulness of the embeddings extracted by the model.

conclusionsWe show that the proposed models have consistently high classification accuracy on both training and testing sets. In comparison, the recently proposed MOCSS model that imposes an orthogonality penalty in the post-processing step has lower classification accuracy that is on par with JIVE.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsNeoplasmsAlgorithmsAutoencoderHumansMultiomicsAutoencodersData integrationMulti-omicsShared and specific information

Identifiers

PMID40830833
PMCPMC12362917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.