ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Construction of a feature gene and machine prediction model for inflammatory bowel disease based on multichip joint analysis.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota-derived metabolites target C5AR1/KDM2A/HCAR3 axis in inflammatory bowel disease: a multi-machine learning algorithms and molecular docking study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Disc inflammation and intercellular communication in shaping the immune microenvironment of intervertebral disc degeneration.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic nonspecific inflammatory disorder triggered by immune responses and genetic factors. Currently, there is no cure for IBD, and its etiology remains unclear. As a result, early detection and diagnosis of IBD pose significant challenges. Therefore, investigating biomarkers in peripheral blood is highly important, as they can assist doctors in the early identification and management of IBD.
methodsWe used a multichip joint analysis approach to explore the database thoroughly. On the basis of methods such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), machine learning techniques, and the SHAP model, we developed a diagnostic model for IBD. To select genetic features, we utilized three machine learning algorithms, namely, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), to identify differentially expressed genes. Additionally, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the enriched molecular pathways of these differentially expressed genes through Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses. Moreover, we used the SHAP model to interpret the results of the machine learning process. Finally, we examined the relationships between the differentially expressed genes and immune cells.
resultsThrough machine learning, we identified four crucial biomarkers for IBD, namely, LOC389023, DUOX2, LCN2, and DEFA6. The SHAP model was used to elucidate the contribution of the differentially expressed genes to the diagnostic model. These genes were associated primarily with immune system modulation and microbial alterations. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses indicated that the differentially expressed genes demonstrated associations with molecular pathways such as the antimicrobial and IL-17 signaling pathways. By performing correlation and differential analyses between differentially expressed genes and immune cells, we found that M1 macrophages exhibited stable differential changes in all four differentially expressed genes. M2 macrophages, resting mast cells, neutrophils, and activated memory CD4 T cells all showed significant differences in three of the differentially expressed genes.
conclusionWe identified differentially expressed genes (LOC389023, DUOX2, LCN2, and DEFA6) with significant immune-related effects in IBD. Our findings suggest that machine learning algorithms outperform ANNs in the diagnosis of IBD. This research provides a theoretical foundation for the clinical diagnosis, targeted therapy, and prognostic evaluation of IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.