ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
NetStart 2.0: prediction of eukaryotic translation initiation sites using a protein language model.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MetaTIS: a tool to predict cognate and near-cognate translation initiation sites in human.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Frameshift Mutations in Exon 1 ofJournal of developmental biology · 2026Article
- The promise of AlphaFold for gene structure annotation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Non-pterygium Escobar syndrome from compound-heterozygous CHRNG variants: genotype-phenotype insights.Human genome variation · 2026Article
- Genomic stop codon scanning reveals quantitative principles of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of translation initiation sites is essential for the proper translation of mRNA into functional proteins. In eukaryotes, the choice of the translation initiation site is influenced by multiple factors, including its proximity to the 5[Formula: see text] end and the local start codon context. Translation initiation sites mark the transition from non-coding to coding regions. This fact motivates the expectation that the upstream sequence, if translated, would assemble a nonsensical order of amino acids, while the downstream sequence would correspond to the structured beginning of a protein. This distinction suggests potential for predicting translation initiation sites using a protein language model.
resultsWe present NetStart 2.0, a deep learning-based model that integrates the ESM-2 protein language model with the local sequence context to predict translation initiation sites across a broad range of eukaryotic species. NetStart 2.0 was trained as a single model across multiple species, and despite the broad phylogenetic diversity represented in the training data, it consistently relied on features marking the transition from non-coding to coding regions.
conclusionBy leveraging "protein-ness", NetStart 2.0 achieves state-of-the-art performance in predicting translation initiation sites across a diverse range of eukaryotic species. This success underscores the potential of protein language models to bridge transcript- and peptide-level information in complex biological prediction tasks. The NetStart 2.0 webserver is available at: https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetStart-2.0/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.