Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830740›Full record

Trial reportTargeted oncology2025

Elranatamab Fixed Dosing: A Safe, Effective, and Convenient Dosing Approach.

Mohamed Elmeliegy, Pooneh Soltantabar, Jennifer Hibma, Olivia Ashman, Diane Wang, Hoi-Kei Lon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04649359 (MAGNETISMM-3 AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, NON-RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 STUDY OF ELRANATAMAB), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04649359 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Magnetismm-3 an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized phase 2 study of elranatamab (pf-06863135) monotherapy in participants with multiple myeloma who are refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor, one immunomodulatory drug and one anti-cd38 antibody

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2021 to 2026Enrolled187ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsElranatamab (PF-06863135)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. T cell engagers in autoimmune diseases.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed ElmeliegyOncology Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Pooneh SoltantabarOncology Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Jennifer HibmaPfizer Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Olivia AshmanPfizer Global Medical Strategy, Pfizer Ltd, London, UK.
Diane WangOncology Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Hoi-Kei LonOncology Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. ceci.lon@pfizer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2526-1387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) are a promising modality for cancer treatment, and evaluation of dosing strategies, including utilization of body weight-based versus fixed dosing, is essential to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. Elranatamab is a bispecific TCE that targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on multiple myeloma cells and CD on T cells. Elranatamab is approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

objectiveEvaluate the impact of body weight on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of elranatamab. PATIENTS AND

methodsData from the phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359) were used to evaluate the impact of body weight on the PK, safety, and efficacy of elranatamab. This trial comprised two cohorts: cohort A included patients who had not previously received BCMA-directed therapy and cohort B included patients who had received prior BCMA-directed therapies. All patients received a 76-mg fixed dose of subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly after a two-step priming dose regimen. Blood samples were collected from MagnetisMM-3 trial patients for PK analysis. This study analyzed the PK, efficacy, and safety of elranatamab across body weight quartiles.

resultsThe results demonstrated that when elranatamab was given at a fixed dose, the predose concentrations showed overlapping distributions with comparable medians, especially across the lowest three body weight quartiles, with a lower median for quartile 4, which was not considered clinically relevant. There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety profile between different body weight quartiles. With respect to efficacy, the overall response and complete response rates were comparable across body weight quartiles. A clinically meaningful objective response rate benefit with overlapping confidence intervals was observed across all four quartiles, consistent with the primary efficacy analysis. No trend was identified between body weight and progression-free survival and the duration of response on the basis of the Kaplan-Meier curves.

conclusionsConcerns with flat dosing include the potential for overdosing those with lower body weights and underdosing individuals with higher body weights. However, this study provides evidence that fixed dosing of elranatamab is effective and demonstrated a consistent and manageable safety profile across a broad range of body weights. There is no significant impact of body weight on the PK, safety, or efficacy of elranatamab. These findings support the approved fixed dosing of elranatamab in patients with RRMM. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04649359.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Bispecific

Identifiers

PMID40830740
PMCPMC12454520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.