Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40830706›Full record

ReviewAnatomical sciences education2026

Narrative inquiry for beginners: A practical guide for health professions education researchers.

Shemona Y Rozario, Michelle D Lazarus, Mahbub Sarkar, Melanie K Farlie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shemona Y RozarioCentre of Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-7317
Michelle D LazarusCentre of Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-4386
Mahbub SarkarMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Melanie K FarlieMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-1496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narrative inquiry (NI) is a rich methodological approach centered around the analysis of stories. While NI has great value within health professions education research, it may be overwhelming for novice researchers (or those new to NI) to employ in practice. This article draws from the first author's doctoral study experiences alongside the supervisors (i.e., co-authors). By highlighting our decision-making processes, we aim to encourage researchers to consider using NI within their research contexts. This work also illustrates the value of NI within health professions education research. We discuss the main challenges we faced when using NI including the diversity of NI conceptualizations, the different definitions of a story, and the multitude of possibilities to approach data analysis. We then outline the approach we took to analyze narrative data (re-storying, narrative synthesis, and thematic analysis) and describe the process used to visually represent the data as journey maps, inspired by Kurt Vonnegut's "Cinderella" story. In doing so, we seek to demonstrate the potential for NI approaches to enrich the diversity, breadth, and depth of health professions education research and, by extension, influence educational practice.

Indexed as

AnatomyHealth OccupationsNarrationResearch PersonnelHumansResearch Designhealth professions educationnarrative inquiryqualitative researchre‐storying

Identifiers

PMID40830706
PMCPMC12934378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.