ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
A Regulatory Perspective on a UK Federated Data Network for Medicines and Medical Devices: Lessons from a 'Study-A-Thon'.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internationally, medical regulators are seeking to make better use of real-world data (RWD) to support their decision making. While the UK National Health Service collects population-wide cradle-to-grave data, challenges remain around siloing, interoperability and access to data across different care settings. In 2023, a `Study-A-Thon' was held to explore how mobilisation of a UK distributed data network might be used to generate real-world evidence (RWE) for regulatory purposes by increasing availability of RWD in a timely manner. Two research questions focusing on high-priority data gaps (medical devices and secondary care prescribing) were selected as case studies to support this work. This paper summarises details of the Study-A-Thon and discusses key learnings for the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), UK stakeholders and international partners to reflect on when developing and implementing RWD strategies. Shortcomings of the data are discussed, such as a lack of follow-up for patients across care settings and the need to develop common data models to capture relevant information on medical product utilisation. The importance of local data and clinical expertise for success is highlighted, from encouraging better data collection at point of care through to appropriate interpretation of results. Successful delivery of results for both studies supports the view that, with further development, a UK federated data model could enhance national regulatory decision-making across the product lifecycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.